Humanist Perspectives: issue 172: Asimov's Next Revolution
Asimov's Next Revolution
by Yves Saint-Pierre
I remember, back in 1979, in the
context of Einstein’s one-hundredth anniversary, the famous, brilliant
scientist and prolific science writer, Isaac Asimov, long-time vice-president
of Mensa International and, incidentally, president of the American Humanist
Association, was being interviewed on the radio.
To be honest, the only thing I remember about that interview, because it
really struck me, is the last question: “Einstein’s work revolutionized
the world of physics. In what area of human endeavour do you think the next
revolution will occur?” He gave a one word answer and the interview
was over. He said: “Economics”.
Later, in the Thatcher, Reagan, Mulroney period, I observed
a significant and widespread change in the socio/political/economic agenda.
Fiscal responsibility and paying down the national debt became a priority.
Now it had never been a campaign issue, nor was it part of the mandate given
to Mulroney by the people he served. Shortly thereafter I came to realize that
this thrust was driven by the unelected, privileged men at the International
Monetary Fund and the World Bank, not by the tax-paying electorate of the countries
in which it was applied. And when Mulroney rammed through the F.T.A., in spite
of wide-spread and very vocal opposition and in direct violation of a pre-election
promise not to do so, I began to understand. And later, when I saw that education
and health care and the prison system were on the agenda of the N.A.F.T.A talks,
it became clearer. What better way to make the private option attractive than
to starve these state funded services of public monies, and what better way
to do that than to suck all available monies into debt repayment and the balancing
of accounts. All of this went under the guise of fiscal responsibility and
all of it was being driven by the I.M.F. and the W.B.
Capital drives and controls every area of human activity in much the same
way the Medieval Church did in Europe and with much the same disdain for
the plight of the common man.
I don’t want to stray too far out of my comfort zone.
I am not an economist. But I don’t think anyone can quarrel with what
has been said so far. I recall these events simply to establish how I became
aware of what, by now, should be absolutely obvious to anyone paying the least
bit of attention. The real power in the world today is the power of capital.
It drives and controls every area of human activity in much the same way the
Medieval Church did in Europe, and with much the same disdain for the plight
of the common man. It lies behind the foreign and domestic policies of practically
every government in the world. And it is driven by one imperative alone, to
increase the immediate profits of the small minority of extremely rich men
in the interest of whom the entire economic edifice of the world now operates.
This is neither paranoia nor conspiracy theory. Look around you carefully.
Read some of the position and policy papers of the W.B., the I.M.F., the W.T.O.
the O.E.C.D. available on line. Consider what lies behind the verbiage and
the pretence. It doesn’t take a genius.
I have no idea what Asimov was thinking when he made that
remark in 1979. But what seems absolutely obvious to me is that until global
economics are made to rest first and foremost on one standard, on the sustainable
health of earth’s soil, water and air, we have got it mostly wrong. And
I know, as well, that the nature of power and the power of capital are such
that a radical change over to that standard will not occur without a revolution
on a massive scale. Our best hope is that it occur rapidly and peacefully as
a result of a global change of consciousness. There are encouraging advances
on that front daily. But I fear that such a huge change is unlikely to occur
peacefully at the speed that most environmental science warns us is needed
to avert disaster. I fear it may occur only in the wake of catastrophes and
conflicts of unimaginable proportions. For the sake of our children and grand-children,
it is incumbent on us to do everything in our power to avoid that.
And we do have leverage. It lies in this: while, de facto,
sovereign states and their representatives retain only risible vestiges of
power, they remain essential as masks for the real power. They can not be exposed
as being devoid of all sovereignty without discrediting the real organs of
power. In order to keep operating effectively, the organizations mentioned
above must appear to be respectful of international law, benevolent and measured
in their attitudes and actions. For these reasons we can and must apply pressure
and the pressure we apply may have an effect. Think of Seattle. I feel viscerally
and strongly that the only significant responsibility endemic to us humans
is respectful stewardship of the earth we tend for our children. Such respectful
stewardship can not be driven by the capitalist imperative. The time to take
action is now. The young and energetic would do well to look into and to join
the most effective and creditable group in their area opposed to capitalist-driven
globalization. Dramatic and vociferous demonstrations have an impact. That
is a proven fact. And all of us can use the “pen”. And we should.
The Prime Minister and the Minister of the Environment are employed and paid
by you and they work for you (or must appear to). Demand accountability. At
Copenhagen Canada was persistently obstructionist. Demand to know on what science
this position was based. These people were acting on your behalf; it is your
right to know.
…until global economics are made to rest …on one standard,
on the sustainability of earth’s soil, water and air, we have got it
mostly wrong.
While I advocate action, I confess I often feel hopeless.
The rapacious greed that fuels the progress of capitalism is supported by the
most powerful institutions and the most powerful military in the world. But
the courageous philosophers, scientists and artists of the Renaissance struggled
against what was, at the time, equally entrenched opposition. Yet within a
relatively short period they were able to shake off the shackles of a universally
oppressive church. And philosophy and science were once again able to flourish.
It took the sustained courage of countless independent and responsible people
guided by the light of free thought and human self-respect. Those forces are
needed again, more now than ever before. The health of earth and the future
of humankind are at stake. Nothing less.
My hopelessness is also alleviated by placing things in perspective,
particularly our absurd arrogance. This tiny planet of ours had been circling
that star in the far reaches of that galaxy in the unimaginably vast universe
for billions of years before evolution spawned our bizarre species. And for
well over ninety percent of the short time we have been here we were hunter/gatherers
with no concept of money. And I would further like to remind the financier,
in his tower, and the general, in his war room, that ever since we evolved
we have breathed, eaten, drunk, defecated and fornicated in much the same way.
We have danced, laughed, suffered, cried and most of us have died and all of
us will. And each of us was born of a mother whose mother is Earth. So, gentlemen,
screw you and hello.
By the measures evoked in the previous paragraph, my life
is absurdly insignificant, but its insignificance is matched only by its consequence.
It is my one chance to be an integrated earthling. In that bond with earth,
at once individual, collective and universal, is the only sacredness I can
sense and recognize. Like religion, capitalist economics tends to trivialize
when it doesn’t vilify the sacredness of my humanity, the sacredness
of life. So, yes, let me echo the prescient Asimov and say vehemently, the
next revolution…“economics”.
In this issue, we offer something of a mixed bag. Mehra Furminger
explores the complexities of forging an identity for a mixed race Canadian
woman. Susan Frome looks into the influence of Scottish philosopher Thomas
Carlyle on Emerson and Thoreau. Dr. Khalid Sohail considers Darwin from the
perspective of his conflict with his beloved wife over the issue of religious
faith. Morgan Duchesney, long time martial arts practitioner, looks into the
humanistic benefits of martial arts discipline and practice. Goldwin Emerson
who offered us a reflective piece on science and morality in the last issue
continues his exploration of the question, this time addressing the roots of
morality.
We also introduce the Featured Letter. Not quite a feature
article but more than a regular letter, the Featured Letter provides an additional
forum for reader responses to issues raised in the magazine, or simply for
opinion on issues of interest to our readers. We are pleased to introduce this
new feature with an interesting letter from new reader Chuck Shamata. Many
of you will have recognized in Chuck Shamata the name of one of Canada’s
finest and most beloved actors of stage, television and film. Also a producer
and screen writer, Chuck Shamata reveals himself as a thoughtful and entertaining
writer on the subject of humanism.
We also include an external document. In the interest of keeping
our readers updated on happenings in the non-theist world as they come to our
attention, we include the manifesto of a new atheist group. David Rand, a founding
member and signatory provides an introduction. The environmental theme is picked up again in the very amusing satirical piece, Lawn Care, found and sent in by reader Dan Morrison. It’s not easy to get a laugh from environmental issues these days.
I hope you find much here to inform, enlighten and entertain
you. As usual, we look forward to your responses and suggestions.
—Yves Saint-Pierre